TRUMP’s TRAVEL BAN APPROVED BY SUPREME COURT

The U.S. Supreme Court  upheld the Trump administration’s travel restrictions  from five Muslim countries. Hence giving  Trump a victory in enforcing one of his most controversial policies.

The high court justices ruled that the president has the authority under U.S. immigration laws to limit travel from foreign countries. To reduce risk of  national security.

Chief Justice John Roberts delivered the majority opinion, writing that Trump’s September 2017 executive order restricting travel is “squarely within the scope of presidential authority” under U.S. immigration laws.

The president has “undoubtedly fulfilled” the requirement under the 1965 Immigration and Nationality Act. Stating that the entry of the targeted foreign travelers “would be detrimental to the interests of the United States.”

The chief justice also dismissed arguments of the challengers. The state of Hawaii, the Hawaii Muslim Association and three residents – that the travel restrictions violated the establishment clause of the U.S. Constitution’s First Amendment, which bars favoring one religion over another.

Opposition in and out of court

Unsurprisingly, the court’s four liberal justices dissented from Tuesday’s ruling.

Justice Sonia Sotomayor likened it to a 1944 Supreme Court decision that affirmed the U.S. government’s authority to place Japanese-Americans in military internment camps during World War II.

“History will not look kindly on the court’s misguided decision today, nor should it,” Sotomayor wrote.

Under the travel ban, issued in September after courts blocked its two earlier permutations, citizens of five Muslim countries – Iran, Libya, Somalia, Syria and Yemen – as well as North Koreans and some Venezuelan officials – are barred from traveling to the United States.

Chad, another predominantly Muslim nation, was initially on the list, but was dropped in April after the U.S. government said the country had complied with its information-sharing requirements.

The decision caps nearly 17 months of intense court battles. Trying to defend the country from insecurity and detectors.

In a statement, Trump called the ruling “a tremendous victory for the American People and the Constitution.”

“In this era of worldwide terrorism and extremist movements bent on harming innocent civilians. We must properly vet those coming into our country,” Trump said.

There is no evidence that immigrants and foreign travelers in general  and specifically from the countries. Others are more likely to pose a threat to national security than native-born Americans.

Muslim Advocates, a Washington based advocacy organization, said that with its ruling, the court affirmed “Trump’s bigoted Muslim ban”.  Hence, has “given a green light to religious discrimination and animus.”

Also read : NSSF: EARNS US $8M FROM KIGAMBONI TOLL BRIDGE.

Leave a Comment